[1979]1 MLJ 135 at p.148 Pengarah Tanah dan Galian,WP v Sri Lembah Enterprise "Unfettered discretion is a contradiction in terms.....Every legal power must have legal limits,otherwise there is a dictatorship....The Courts are the only defence of the liberty of the subject against departmental aggression."This research on AL has been written with the following objectives :- -Generally,but not exhaustively,it covers an overall spectrum of Malaysian Administrative Law.
Thursday, May 4, 2017
Thursday, October 27, 2016
DUE PROCESS
A fundamental requirement of due process is the "...opportunity to be heard..."It is an opportunity which must be granted at a meaningful time and in a meaningful way..."
Tuesday, October 11, 2016
2015 1 MLJ
DATUK SERI KHALID BIN ABU BAKAR & ORS V N INDRA ( THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE OF THE ESTATE AND DEPENDANT OF KUGAN A/L ANATHAN , DECEASED)
Police- Duties of Police Breach of statutory duties - Detainee beaten to death by policemen whilst in detention - Abuse of remand warrant - attempt to cover up incident Vicarious liability - whether tortfeasor and superior officers liable for deceased death
Held:- where there is a breach of a constitutional right by a public authority, S8 (2) of the Civil Law Act does not apply and the courts cannot be barred from awarding exemplary damages. Section 8 of the CLA ONLY applies to private torts in so far as the prohibition of awarding exemplary damages. This was an appropriate case to award exemplary damages.
Writers opinion= Courts award exemplary compensation when on the facts before the Court, the actions of the offender are so reprehensible with a conscious disregard for the rights of another. The basis of this reasoning is that, it it to deter others from engaging in a similar conduct.
Tuesday, October 4, 2016
1st Amendment ( US Constitution)
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free excercise thereof , or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peacebly to assemble, and to petition the Goverment for a redress of grievances.
Monday, September 26, 2016
Thursday, September 1, 2016
Setiauusaha Suruhanjaya Pasukan Polis v Cheah Yen Kee [2016]2 2 CLJ 791
Judicial Review- Dismissal of Police Officer
Held : It is a principle of law based on established judicial precedent that where in a situation where a public decision making body takes into account extraneous factors behind the backs of the party aggrieved by the decision, the decision of that public authority will be rendered unlawful for being in breach of the principles of natural justice .......procedurally unfair.
Sunday, August 28, 2016
1932- MLJ -1 at page 5
This is a very old case and much reliance was placed on English and Indian authorities,
CHEW CHENG SWEE V CHAN CHYE NEO
The only point argued before us was that the proceedings were in their nature civil and not criminal and that that therefore no appeal lies from the Order of 8th September 1931 under Chapter XXVIII of the CPC.
Held:- There is ample authority in India and in England that maintenance proceedings though criminal in form are really civil matters. [ tokee Bibee v Abdool Khan ILR 5 Calcutta at p. 536 at page 542]
Wednesday, August 24, 2016
LEGAL REASONING AND LEGAL WRITING
Language is the lawyers scalpel.If he cannot use it skillfully, he is apt to butcher his suffering clients case
LEGAL REASONING AND LEGAL WRITINGRichard K. Neumann, Jr. Professor at Law.
Saturday, August 6, 2016
THANGASAMY BROWN- [2009] 5 AMR 519
Thangasamy Brown a/l DN Gnanayutham v Pelabuhan Tanjung Pelepas Sdn Bhd & Anor
Labour Law- Held:- Having concluded that the appellant was engaged for a fixed term of six months and that the contract would be terminated by effluxion of time on December 31, 2000 there was no question of reinstatement but only compensation to be awarded by the Industrial Court for premature termination arising from the constructive dismissal which occurred on September 25 ,2000.
Monday, July 4, 2016
LTPAHBPP v UTRA BADI K PERUMAL [2000] 3 CLJ 224,239 (CA)
Lembaga Tatatertib Perkhidmatan Awam Hospital Besar Pulau Pinang & Anor v Utra Badi K Perumal
Gopal Sri Ram JCA stated:
" When a person is deprived of his reputation, it would in my judgment amount to a deprivation of life within Art 5(1) of the Federal Constitution.The right to reputation is part and parcel of the human dignity. And it is the fundamental right of every person within the shores of Malaysia to live with common human dignity."
Adrian Joseph-2005 2 LNS (Award No 1904 of 2005)
In the case of HLB Bhd v Adrian D'cruz the Industrial Court stated inter alia, that the Malaysian society does not tolerate sexual harassment. If a person sexually harasses another person at a workplace , that person can expect instant dismissal even if that person has had a good track record.
Saturday, June 25, 2016
Tuesday, August 20, 2013
RULES OF THE COURT 2012
The Rules of the High Court 1980 (P.U.(A) 50 /1980 and the Subordinate Court Rules (P.U.(A)328/80) have been repealed by the Rules of Court 2012 (P.U.(A) 205/2012. The Rules of Court 2012 came into effect on 1.8.2012.
The Rules of Court are not retrospective in effect. All pending actions filed prior to 1.8.2012 are not retrospective in effect. All pending actions filed prior to 1.8.2012 shall not be affected by the new Rules.
Monday, July 15, 2013
Blessed Quietness
Its holiday time and all the students have disappeared.
Thats means no phone calls goes off and no students talking loudly in the library!
Thursday, September 20, 2012
Sunday, September 9, 2012
Tuesday, June 12, 2012
EX DEBITO JUSTITIAE DEFINITION
A matter ex debito justiciae is one which a litigant is entitled merely upon the asking for it; as opposed to something which may be a matter of judicial discretion or determination.
The above application is usually related to set aside a Judgment In Default which was entered against the Defendants by the Plaintiffs. This is a tricky area. Some Defendants will deliberately evade service of the Summons and when Judgment is entered against them, only then will they show their faces and claim then the Judgment was not entered properly and start quoting " ex debito justiciae - that they have the right to set aside the Judgment.
The above application is usually related to set aside a Judgment In Default which was entered against the Defendants by the Plaintiffs. This is a tricky area. Some Defendants will deliberately evade service of the Summons and when Judgment is entered against them, only then will they show their faces and claim then the Judgment was not entered properly and start quoting " ex debito justiciae - that they have the right to set aside the Judgment.
Friday, May 18, 2012
FATIMA IS ADMITTED TO THE BAR
Congratulations- Peguam Fatima!!! Well Done!!
Friday, April 20, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











